- The 1690 Experts Who Are Not Climate Scientists
- No Evidence, Just Empty Words
- The Motivation Behind Climate Denial
- Net Zero: Not Just Good for the Planet, But Good for Business
- The Real Consensus: Climate Change Is an Emergency
- Final Thoughts: Don’t Fall for Pseudo-Science
- Stay Informed, Stay Critical
There’s no denying the reality of climate change. But every so often, a group of individuals attempts to convince us otherwise, using inflated numbers and vague titles to make waves. Over a year ago, an organisation called Clintel published the “World Climate Declaration”, now boasting 1690 signatures from people allegedly supporting the idea that climate change isn’t an emergency. But here’s the truth—very few, if any, of these signatories actually hold degrees in climate science. Let’s look into why this so-called declaration is just another attempt at smoke and mirrors.
The 1690 Experts Who Are Not Climate Scientists
Clintel’s World Climate Declaration claims to have the backing of almost 1700 experts. But a closer look at the signatories reveals an interesting, if not laughable, trend: nearly none of them have actual expertise in climate science. From economists to engineers, it’s a list filled with people who, while accomplished in their own fields, have little to no professional grounding in the complex science behind climate change.
According to a Euronews fact-check source, the credibility of this declaration quickly falls apart upon examination. The reality is that an engineer or economist may have a solid understanding of their field, but they lack the specialised training to understand or make authoritative claims about climate science.
No Evidence, Just Empty Words
The declaration’s primary assertion is that climate science is not settled, implying that there’s still debate about whether climate change is happening or not. But here’s the deal: scientific consensus overwhelmingly supports the reality of human-caused climate change. Organisations like NASA, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), and thousands of climate scientists have produced mountains of peer-reviewed data confirming this.
So, what evidence does Clintel provide to support its bold claims? None, really. Their declaration is a collection of cherry-picked ideas, unsupported assertions, and a glaring absence of scientific data. It’s essentially like shouting “Fire!” in a crowded theatre and providing zero evidence of smoke or flames.
The Motivation Behind Climate Denial
At first glance, it might seem confusing—why would anyone promote the idea that climate change isn’t real? A quick look at Clintel’s backing and affiliations offers clues. Climate denial is big business for some industries, particularly those that benefit from a status quo where fossil fuels remain the norm. By denying climate change or downplaying its effects, these groups protect their interests while causing untold harm to the planet.
Clintel’s declaration, with its dubious signatures and unsupported claims, is a prime example of this. It’s not about truth or science; it’s about maintaining the current economic structures that benefit a select few.
Net Zero: Not Just Good for the Planet, But Good for Business
While Clintel pushes its false narrative, the world is already moving towards Net Zero emissions. And here’s the amazing part: Net Zero isn’t just about saving the planet, it’s also good for the economy. By investing in renewable energy, energy efficiency, and sustainable practices, countries and companies are creating new jobs, new projects, and new revenue streams.
Even the oil and gas industry is adapting. Major players like Shell and BP have started investing heavily in hydrogen electrolysers and other renewable technologies. These initiatives aren’t just feel-good gestures; they’re smart business strategies designed to keep these companies relevant in a world that’s increasingly rejecting fossil fuels.
Transitioning to Net Zero offers a huge opportunity for job creation—from building wind turbines to installing solar panels, the renewable sector is booming. Even traditional energy companies are finding that diversifying into renewables can open up brand-new markets. It’s a win-win: tackle climate change while spurring economic growth.
The Real Consensus: Climate Change Is an Emergency
While Clintel and similar organisations try to stir up doubt, the overwhelming majority of scientists agree that climate change is not only real but also accelerating. Rising sea levels, extreme weather events, and shifts in biodiversity are not hypothetical. They’re happening right now, and the evidence is visible around the world—from shrinking glaciers to stronger hurricanes.
Groups like the IPCC and countless climate experts provide hard-hitting data and projections. Climate change isn’t up for debate among experts who are actively researching the field. It’s only in the circles of pseudo-experts like Clintel’s signatories where you’ll find such widespread denial.
Final Thoughts: Don’t Fall for Pseudo-Science
At the end of the day, Clintel’s World Climate Declaration is nothing more than a stunt. The 1690 signatories are not climate scientists, and their declaration is backed by no actual evidence. They’re simply playing on people’s fears and misconceptions to serve interests that are directly opposed to global sustainability.
So, when you hear about declarations and petitions claiming that climate change isn’t real, remember to look at the facts. Listen to actual climate scientists who dedicate their lives to understanding this complex issue—not a handful of people with degrees in unrelated fields.
Stay Informed, Stay Critical
The next time someone brings up the World Climate Declaration as “evidence” that climate change isn’t an emergency, point them to the facts. Because, as it turns out, 1690 names without climate science expertise are just that—1690 empty names.
